Critical Listening Paper Essay

Social psychologist Amy Cuddy presents a formal demonstrative language on trunk verbiage. The general excogitation of the idiom was to inform. Cuddys attire was formal. She was dressed in sinister high heels, black stockings, a black skirt, a long thin black cover-up, and jewelrya heavy necklace and hoop earrings. The loud vocalisers introduction by all odds captured my attention. She started her lecturing by stating that she would offer a free no-tech life hack surplus to a request that she made to the audience this definitely draws the audience into what she is about(predicate) to say. The speaker engages with her audience by asking them to perform a certain act, while also enticing them with a free life-hack. It certain did enhance the speakers credibility because she is offering some kind of valuable advice to her audience. The audience is loosely older in age (late 20s & up), there is a mix of males and females, and there seems to be a good diversity in races.Most ar e dressed semi-formally if not formally. The speaker definitely adapts her remarks to the audience by catering to the characteristics of their demographics ex. Relating her result to job interviews. The speaker establishes rapport with her audience through incessant eye contact, communicative conversational t oneness, fluency, hand/arm gestures, and personal stories. Cuddys dustup was about body language and how we see ourselves. The speakers thesis statement was the following Fake it until you become it. The briny points for this mother tongue are the following our non-verbals govern how we think and feel about ourselves (Power-posing), our bodies modify our minds (Testosterone/cortisol levels), and our bodies change our behavior and our behavior changes our outcomes. The speaker uses the topical organizational pattern to deliver her speech. It is definitely appropriate for the topic and speaking situation.Her organization makes it easier for the audience to logi jawy interpre t and understand the important points that she is trying to make. Additionally, the speaker uses language to improve the effectiveness of her speech. She is rattling conversational which exerts the audience to be more alert, responsive, and empathetic to her. The speakers speaking voice is not monotone and she definitely uses effective vocabulary in her speech as wellnot too difficult, but not too plain.Additionally, the Cuddy uses the right amount of vocal expressions. Amy Cuddy in general used images to support her worldly. Her short clip and images worked highly well in supporting her main points/argument. in any case the effective images on her slideshow, the speakers use of her personal experiences and stories definitely supported her points. She establishes her credibility by showing a story that ultimately establishes her educational level Cuddy is a professor at Harvard University.Cuddy concludes her speech by reiterating her thesis statement and reinforcing the speech s general and specific purpose. She ends her speech with a call to action. The conclusion that she makes calls the audience to 1.) try power-posing and 2.) to share the science. The speaker provides closure to show the audience that her speech was faultless with her call to action and thanking the audience. The speakers use of non-verbal elements of deliin truth was outstanding. Her arm and hand gestures were appropriate, she maintained meaningful eye contact/engagement throughout her entire speech, and her overall body language to her audience was one that really entices the audience to pay attention and be engaged. The speaker used presentation aids, and in my opinion, they were extremely effective and sweet.Moreover, it is clear to see that the speakers presentation aids were adequate supporting material through the audiences reactions ex. Laughter, applause. In my opinion, the strongest role of the speech was the speakers story about her personal experience. This was part of the body of her speech and it was her supporting evidence for one of her main points. She used feeling to appeal to her audience about her tragic accident and her journey to recovery and faking it until you become it. This was the strongest part of the speech because it is memorable and got a strong reaction out of the audience. Not only that, but it was great supporting material for the speakers thesis. On the other hand, there werent any weaknesses to Cuddys speech necessarily.If I had to choose one weak point however, it would be the transition from the body to the conclusion. This was the weakest part of the speech because it was difficult to concretely establish the concluding paragraph of the speech. I could not tell whether the ending was part of the speechs body and the conclusion was just extremely short, or whether the conclusion of the speech was very long. A better transition into the conclusion would make the speech better. The setting of this speech wasextremely forma l. The surface of the room was fairly largeit appeared like a theatre. Cuddy is atop a large stage and the blot is on her. The room is darker where the audience is. This kind of setting impacts the speech in a way that makes the speaker the center of attention. The audience gives supportive feedback to the speaker.They laugh at all the right times, and the Cuddy responds to this feedback by really engaging with the audience through her questions and affirmations in a non-overdoing way. At the end of her speech, the members of the audience stand up from their seating while giving her a big applause. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this speaker a 10. This is because this speaker encompassed every characteristic that an effective speaker should portray. She obviously knows what she is doing and has had sufficient practice and experience. I would definitely enjoy listening to Cuddy again because not only was her topic very interesting and enjoyable to listen to and learn about, but she was a great speaker in general.I especially want the way that she catered her speech to her audience. In my opinion, there werent issues that the speaker should have addressed but did not. The speech was succinct and effective. The conclusion of the speech, however, was either too long or too short. I could not tell whether the ending was part of the body and the conclusion was just extremely short, or whether the conclusion was just very long.Works CitedCuddy, A. (2012, October). Your body language shapes who you are. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from TED http//www.ted.com/playlists/171/the_20_most_popular_talks_of_a